Democrats "Own" the Bureaucrats at the DOJ
The
Department of Justice (DOJ) was created and has been tasked with upholding the
laws of the United States and ensuring justice is served. The current head of
the DOJ is Merrick Garland, appointed by Joe Biden and confirmed by the Senate.
He is the Chief law enforcement officer in the country. Previously Garland had
been nominated and for Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court but was eventually
unconfirmed.
Garland's
relationship with Congress has also been a source of contention. Critics argue
that he has not been transparent or forthcoming in his interactions with
lawmakers, leading to a lack of trust and cooperation. This has further
hindered Garland's ability to effectively address key issues and fulfill his
duties as Attorney General.
However, in
recent years, there has been growing concern about the weaponization of the DOJ
for political purposes. This weaponization occurs when the DOJ, FBI and other
alphabet agencies are used as a tool to target political opponents, manipulate
investigations, and advance a particular agenda. This abuse of power undermines
the integrity of the justice system and erodes public trust in the government.
For example,
on March 13, 2021, AG Garland made the ill-fated decision to raid Mar-a-Lago,
the exclusive resort and residence of former President Donald Trump. This
audacious move by Garland left many scratching their heads and wondering what
could have prompted such a brazen act, an act the FBI did not wish to partake
in but was forced to do so. It is important to acknowledge the sheer
audacity of Garland's decision to raid Mar-a-Lago.
Mar-a-Lago
is not just any ordinary location; it is a highly secure and prestigious
property with tight security measures in place. The fact that Garland thought he
could successfully breach the defenses of such a high-profile location speaks
to third world tactics. Biden and the Democrat apparatus going after
political opponents is nothing short of sheer tyrannical acts.
The
potential consequences of this raid cannot be overlooked. Not only did Garland
put himself at risk of facing severe legal repercussions, but he also jeopardized
the safety and security of the residents and staff at Mar-a-Lago. The fallout
from such a high-profile incident could have far-reaching implications and may
have unintended consequences for Garland and his criminal network.
Garland's
decision to raid Mar-a-Lago can be seen as a cautionary tale of the dangers of
hubris and overconfidence. Garland's reckless actions in targeting such a
high-profile location demonstrate the pitfalls of underestimating the risks
involved in weaponizing the DOJ. This raid serves as a stark reminder that even
the most seasoned Democrat operatives are not immune to making bad decisions
that can have far-reaching consequences.
We shouldn’t
forget the legacy media who just happened to be on the scene perpetuating this
nonsense.
One of the
most prominent examples of the weaponization of the DOJ is the investigation
into alleged collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia during the 2016
presidential election. The investigation, led by Special Counsel Robert
Mueller, was highly controversial and polarizing. Critics argued that the DOJ
was being used to undermine the Trump administration and delegitimize the President's
victory. This case highlighted how the DOJ can be exploited for political gain,
rather than impartially upholding the rule of law.
Another
example is the targeting of conservative groups by the Internal Revenue Service
(IRS) during the Obama administration. The DOJ played a role in investigating
and prosecuting these groups, which were allegedly targeted for their political
beliefs. This raised concerns about the politicization of law enforcement and
the abuse of power for partisan purposes. It also highlighted the potential for
the DOJ to be used as a weapon against political opponents.
The
weaponization of the DOJ is not limited to high-profile cases or political
investigations. It can also manifest in more subtle ways, such as the selective
prosecution of individuals based on their political affiliations or beliefs.
This type of targeting can have a chilling effect on free speech and political
dissent, as individuals may fear being targeted by the DOJ for expressing
opinions or affiliations such as the FBI targeting concerned parents at school
board meetings.
Additionally,
the weaponization of the DOJ can undermine the principle of equal justice under
the law. When the DOJ is used to target specific groups or individuals based on
their political beliefs, it erodes the impartiality and fairness of the justice
system. This can lead to a lack of trust in the government and a perception
that the DOJ is not acting in the best interests of all citizens. Keep in mind
that Democrats preach that “no one is above the law” as they target
conservatives but refuse to hold accountable groups such as BLM and Antifa
among others.
The
weaponization of the DOJ also raises concerns about the separation of powers
and checks and balances within the government. When the DOJ is used to target
political opponents or advance a particular agenda, it blurs the lines between
the executive branch and the judiciary. This undermines the system of checks
and balances that is essential for a functioning democracy and can lead to
abuses of power by those in positions of authority.
To combat
the weaponization of the DOJ, it is crucial to maintain transparency and
accountability within the department. This includes ensuring that
investigations are conducted impartially and that prosecutors adhere to ethical
guidelines. It also requires oversight from Congress and the judiciary to
ensure that the DOJ is not being used for political purposes. Democrat
operatives such as Special Counsel Jack Smith and other prosecutors in New
York, Fulton County, Georgia and other venues are collaborating with the White
House in their effort to take Trump off the campaign trail and, if necessary,
imprison him to stop him from becoming President again.
In addition,
the public plays a crucial role in holding the DOJ accountable for its actions.
By being informed and engaged citizens, individuals can shed light on abuses of
power within the department and demand transparency and accountability from
their government. This can help to prevent the weaponization of the DOJ and
ensure that justice is served fairly and equitably.
It’s obvious
Democrats “own” the DOJ. Rest assured, they aren’t done yet.
With the
recent ruling from the U.S. Supreme Court that former Presidents have immunity
for official acts while in office, many of the cases against Trump are falling
apart and/or will be delayed well past the November 2024 general elections.
If Trump is
re-elected, we truly hope there is accountability.
Americans
demand it.
Comments
Post a Comment