First, a Self Appointed King: Now Greenwich Has a Self Appointed Queen

 

Screenshot (ctpost.com)


No kingdom would be complete without both a king AND a queen.

Not too long ago, we published a blog where First Selectman Fred Camillo went ahead with his controversial bump out projects without Representative Town Meeting (RTM) approval. By simply doing his own will, rather than those of his constituents and of the RTM, who are elected to represent those same constituents, he has been dubbed the “King of Greenwich.” There are many reasons for this title and they suit him fine. This is but one of the many examples.

Now, it appears we also have a “Queen” in Dr. Toni Jones, Superintendent of Greenwich Public Schools (GPS) and an APPOINTED employee of the Greenwich Board of Education and taxpayers.

GPS recently issued a new policy on cell phone usage or electronic resources during the school day. Regulation 6141.326R strictly limits when an electronic resource may be used. The policy prohibits high schools students from using their devices from “bell to bell” and goes on to restrict K-8 students from using “smart” wearable devices such as FitBits, Apple watches, etc. Special permission must be given by a teacher or administrator for course work or other needs.

Students, Parents Complain About Greenwich Public Schools New Cell Phone Policy Banning Phones From "Bell To Bell" Read

How did the regulation come about and why was this not approved by the BOE?

Perhaps we should start with who pushed for this agenda, namely Ariella Feldman and Jessica Hirsch, both moms and both whom will have their children entering kindergarten and third grade at Greenwich Country Day Schools, a private school in Greenwich. They are part of a local chapter of the “OK to Delay” organization, which is a movement that seeks to unite parents who are concerned over their children’s social media and cell phone usage. OK to Delay has eleven chapters in five states, including Connecticut, which include Fairfield, Darien and now Greenwich. Hirsch and Feldman decided to bring the program to Greenwich. In fact, one of their “ambassadors” Adam Potter has started a petition urging GPS school facilities be “phone free” throughout the school day.

Two Greenwich moms want to ban cellphones "bell to bell;" 700 people signed the petition Read

Clearly this is just one more example of outside forces influencing Greenwich. Perhaps you recall the “Zuckbucks” grants approved by the RTM for the registrar’s office for “election integrity.”  

As noted earlier, Hirsch and Feldman have children in private schools, yet want to dictate policy for the public schools. Such hypocrisy should be examined by all parents who have children in the public schools. These moms should lead by example and place their children in GPS instead of pushing for agendas that affect all children and parents from a distance. Monarchs rule their subjects this. Fortunately, we have a representative local government that is elected to benefit the entire town, not certain segments contained within. We find what these “moms” are doing as disingenuous and should really look at the impacts their agenda has on a lot of residents.

Screenshot (Greenwich Time)


We’re wondering where the BOE is. They are the ultimate decision makers, elected by the residents of Greenwich. However, we have an appointed official who has taken it upon herself to change policies on a whim without thinking things through. Apparently Dr. Jones doesn’t believe in answering to the BOE and the BOE appears to have no problem allowing Dr. Jones to do as she pleases without their informed and formal consent. What are we missing here? Don’t the taxpayers, the residents who fund all things GPS, including salaries, have a say. Is the BOE in charge of anything or are they just occupying seats waiting to be told by a subordinate what happens and which agendas to follow. The only thing the BOE has managed to do is extend Dr. Jones’ contract and give her a salary bump.

While we do agree that using electronic devices during a classroom session is inappropriate, there are few things that Dr. Jones, Hirsch, Feldman and the BOE haven’t considered which makes this regulation utterly compromising.

Screenshot (oktodelay.org)


First, we all would like to think schools are a safe place for our children to learn and prosper. History has taught us that, unfortunately, this is not always the case. Children must have the capability of communicating with parents or emergency services in the event of an emergency situation, especially if a teacher, staff member, or anyone nearby is unable to do so. To deny children this communication line is to deny them the opportunity of getting emergency personnel to their school and the ability to possibly describe what the situation is. This is, perhaps, the strongest argument. Our children’s safety come first. Period.

Secondly, parent and child should always have an open communication line for information such as change of plans after school, attending or not attending activities or other unknown variables that may be outside the routine for both.

Furthermore, not being able to use an electronic device during lunch or free periods is ludicrous. Children are outside their classroom session and may wish to catch up with parent communications or simply use their device on their “own” time. It is not disruptive to the operation of the school.

This is really about control, of both children and parents. The same type of control the left is employing across the country on schools. What are these “moms” and this movement really afraid of? That children might record unauthorized teaching material? Perhaps teachers berating/bullying students? Or maybe it’s the woke agenda being pushed on our children? We are not advocating for children to whip out their devices every second but since school administrators are sneaky and the BOE runs a laissez-faire hierarchy, can you really blame children for showing all of us what is really going on?

Unfortunately, the Town of Greenwich has a BOE with no real control of their Superintendent. The BOE, like it or not, is answerable to all taxpayers in Greenwich. If some members of the Board are incapable of fulfilling their elected responsibilities, they should resign and allow new members to actually do the job they were elected to do.

Greenwich is in no need of a “queen” answerable to no one.  This is exactly what we have. Do your jobs. The next municipal elections are not too far off.


Do parents support Gov. Lamont's push for banning cell phones in schools? Read

Okay to Delay


 

 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Dear Establishment Republicans, We're Tired of Your "Bipartisanship"

Trump Debates ABC News Democrat Operatives

With a Clear Mandate From Millions of Americans, President Trump Elected as 47th President of the United States!