Establishment Warmongers vs. Trump the Peacemaker

 

Screenshot (Public Domain)

Establishment politicians, both Republicans and Democrats, also known as career politicians, are closely tied to the political elite, have long-standing relationships with government institutions, and are often perpetuating war and military intervention. This stems from the tendency of establishment politicians to prioritize military solutions to conflicts rather than diplomatic or peaceful resolutions. Take, for example, the conflict in Ukraine where billions of dollars and additional billions in ammunition and weapons are being continually sent over.

One reason why establishment politicians are often labeled as war mongers is their close ties to the military-industrial complex. Many establishment politicians receive significant campaign contributions from defense contractors and other military-related industries. This financial support creates a conflict of interest, as politicians are more inclined to support policies that benefit these industries, such as increased defense spending and military intervention, in order to maintain their financial backing.

Additionally, establishment politicians often come from backgrounds in which they have been exposed to the influence of military organizations and foreign policy experts. This exposure can shape their perspectives and beliefs on the role of military force in international affairs. As a result, they are more likely to support military solutions to conflicts, even when diplomatic or peaceful alternatives may be more viable.

Furthermore, establishment politicians are frequently members of political parties that have historically supported military interventionism. For example, the Democratic and Republican parties (the establishment) in the United States have a track record of supporting military interventions in various countries around the world. This alignment with party ideologies can influence establishment politicians to advocate for a militaristic approach to foreign policy issues.

Another factor is their reliance on intelligence agencies and foreign policy experts for information and guidance on international conflicts. These sources often have a vested interest in promoting military solutions to problems, which can further reinforce establishment politicians' inclination towards militarism.

Moreover, establishment politicians may feel pressure to maintain a tough and aggressive stance on foreign policy in order to appeal to certain voter demographics. National security and defense are often key issues in political campaigns, and politicians may believe that demonstrating a strong stance on these issues will resonate with voters and enhance their chances of re-election, not to mention enlarging agency budgets

In addition, establishment politicians face pressure from lobbyists, interest groups, and other influential parties who stand to benefit from increased military spending and intervention. These external influences shapes politicians' decision-making processes and push them towards advocating for war and military action. If not, the dollars dry up.

Furthermore, establishment politicians are influenced by the notion that the United States has a responsibility to spread “democracy” and freedom around the world. This belief leads to the justification for military intervention in the name of promoting these values, even when the consequences may be harmful or counterproductive. While this may be true, ultimately, it’s your tax dollars and political donations that make the decisions.

In contrast, Former President Trump has a different approach as a peacemaker who has a willingness to engage in direct dialogue with world leaders. Despite criticism from establishment politicians and diplomatic experts, Trump has pursued direct talks with leaders of countries such as North Korea, Russia, and Iran. While these efforts have not always resulted in concrete diplomatic agreements, they have opened up channels of communication that were previously closed off.

Additionally, Trump's "America First" foreign policy stance has led to a more transactional approach to international relations. Rather than adhering strictly to traditional alliances and agreements, Trump has prioritized what he sees as the best interests of the United States in negotiations with other countries. This approach has led to some unexpected breakthroughs, such as the normalization of relations between Israel and several Arab nations.

Furthermore, Trump's focus on economic and trade issues has also been seen as a potential avenue for peace on the world stage. By renegotiating trade agreements and imposing tariffs on countries that engage in unfair trade practices, Trump has sought to level the playing field for American workers and businesses. While these actions have been met with criticism from some quarters, they have also forced countries to come to the negotiating table and reach compromises that benefit all parties involved.

In addition to his actions on the diplomatic and economic fronts, Trump's role as a mediator in regional conflicts has also been cited as evidence of his potential as a peacemaker. For example, Trump played a key role in brokering a peace agreement between Israel and the United Arab Emirates, marking the first such agreement between Israel and an Arab nation in over 25 years. This achievement demonstrates Trump's ability to think outside the box and find creative solutions to long-standing conflicts.

Moreover, Trump's emphasis on boosting the U.S. military and projecting strength on the world stage has been seen as a deterrent to potential adversaries and a means of ensuring peace through strength. By investing in military capabilities and modernizing the armed forces, Trump has sought to send a clear message to countries that might seek to challenge U.S. interests or violate international norms. This approach has been credited with preventing major conflicts and deterring aggression in key regions.

Furthermore, Trump's efforts to address long-standing issues such as nuclear proliferation and terrorism have also been lauded as important steps towards global peace and security. Trump has taken a tough stance on countries that pose a threat to international security, such as North Korea and Iran, while also working to strengthen alliances and partnerships with countries that share common interests. These efforts have helped to build a coalition of like-minded nations committed to upholding peace and stability in a challenging global environment.

In addition, Trump's emphasis on sovereignty and national interests has resonated with many countries that have chafed under the constraints of international organizations and agreements. By asserting the importance of national sovereignty and independence, Trump has empowered countries to take control of their own destinies and pursue policies that are in their best interests. This approach has helped to foster a sense of agency and self-determination among nations that were previously marginalized or overlooked in the international arena.

Trump's unorthodox style and willingness to challenge conventional wisdom have also shaken up the status quo in global politics, leading to new opportunities for dialogue and cooperation. While his approach has been met with skepticism and resistance from some quarters, it has also forced countries to reevaluate their own positions and consider new ways of approaching long-standing issues. This willingness to break with tradition and chart a new course has the potential to create openings for peace and progress on the world stage.

Trump's presidency clearly that he has the potential to be a force for peace on the world stage. His willingness to engage directly with adversaries, pursue economic and trade agreements that benefit all parties, and mediate conflicts in key regions are examples of his unorthodox but effective approach to diplomacy. It is important to recognize that Trump's unique approach to foreign policy created new opportunities for peace and stability in a rapidly changing global landscape.

President Trump is world peace.