The Legacy Media Apparatus Repeats History in a Dangerous Way
Legacy media
outlets, such as newspapers, television networks, cable news and radio
stations, have long had a bias in favor of the Democratic Party. Critics argue
that these media organizations act as operatives for the Democratic Party,
pushing their agenda and unfairly portraying Republicans and conservatives.
This bias has led to a lack of trust in traditional media among many Americans,
who feel that they are not getting a fair and balanced view of the news. The legacy
media are essentially Democratic operatives and have overwhelmingly liberal
leanings of journalists and reporters. Studies have shown that the vast
majority of journalists identify as Democrats, leading to concerns about bias
in their reporting. This bias can manifest itself in the way stories are
covered, the sources that are quoted, and the language that is used in news
reports. These obvious biases shape the narrative presented to the
public and influences public opinion in favor of the Democratic Party.
The legacy
media is not your friend when it comes to truth and unbiased reporting. This is
clearly evident with every broadcast, social media post or words printed on
paper. If we take a step back, we have to realize the media has adopted a
strategy to glorify its leader, namely the Democrat Party apparatus.
Unfortunately, history must always repeat itself and this is a perfect example
of that. Historically speaking Joseph Goebbels, through his Propaganda
Ministry, had done this before by glorifying his boss.
Goebbels employed
a strategy that is still used today by the legacy media: manipulation and
psychology. To put this in some context, we’ll share a brief history on
Goebbels. As you continue to read, you will note how closely the legacy media
is following in his footsteps and how White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre
knowingly echoes the propaganda
Paul Joseph
Goebbels, commonly known as Joseph Goebbels, was a prominent figure in Nazi
Germany as the Minister of Propaganda. Goebbels was known for his exceptional
intelligence and communication skills. He obtained a doctorate in philosophy
and later became a member of the Nazi Party, where he quickly rose through the
ranks due to his talent for spreading the party's propaganda.
Goebbels was
a master of manipulation and persuasion, using his intelligence to craft
messages that would resonate with the German people. His understanding of
psychology and human behavior allowed him to create effective propaganda
campaigns that played on people's fears, prejudices, and desires. Through his
speeches and writings, he was able to shape public opinion and rally support
for the Nazi regime.
As the
Minister of Propaganda, Goebbels had control over all forms of media in Nazi
Germany, allowing him to spread the party's message far and wide. He used
newspapers, radio, films, and other forms of media to promote Nazi ideology and
demonize the regime's enemies. Through relentless propaganda efforts, Goebbels
was able to create a culture of fear and hatred that fueled support for the
Nazi Party.
Goebbels'
intelligence and cunning were evident in his ability to manipulate public
opinion and suppress dissent. He used propaganda to glorify Adolf Hitler as a
charismatic and visionary leader, while painting the regime's enemies as
traitors and enemies of the state. By controlling the flow of information and
suppressing dissenting voices, Goebbels effectively silenced opposition and
maintained control over the German population. His use of propaganda to
manipulate public opinion and incite violence is a stark reminder of the power
of propaganda in shaping public perception and behavior such as the recent
assassination attempts on President Trump’s life. Goebbels was also responsible
for overseeing the Nazi regime's censorship efforts. He banned books, films,
and other forms of media that were deemed subversive or critical of the regime.
By controlling the flow of information and stifling dissent, Goebbels was able
to maintain a tight grip on power and prevent any challenges to the Nazi
Party's authority. However, Goebbels' use of propaganda to promote hatred and
violence ultimately contributed to the destruction and devastation of World War
II.
At its core,
Goebbels' propaganda was a tool used by the Nazi regime in the 1930s and 1940s in
Germany to manipulate and control the German population. It relied on
repetition, emotional appeals, and misinformation to spread its message and
silence dissent. Similarly, legacy media outlets have been accused of using
similar tactics to push a particular narrative or agenda.
One of the
key similarities between Goebbels' propaganda and legacy media is the use of
emotional appeals to sway public opinion. Both rely on stirring up fear, anger,
or outrage in order to mobilize their audiences. By appealing to people's
emotions, they are able to bypass rational thought and critical analysis,
making them more susceptible to manipulation.
Another
similarity between the two is the use of repetition to promote a particular
narrative. Goebbels famously said, "If you tell a lie big enough and keep
repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it." Legacy media
outlets have been using this same tactic by consistently reinforcing certain
narratives or ideas, even in the face of contradictory evidence.
Furthermore,
both Goebbels' propaganda and legacy media seek to silence dissenting voices
and control the flow of information. They do so by marginalizing or demonizing
those who hold differing views, and by limiting the range of perspectives that
are presented to the public. This can create an echo chamber effect, where
people are only exposed to information that reinforces their existing beliefs.
Goebbels'
legacy as the Minister of Propaganda has been widely condemned. His use of
propaganda to spread hatred and incite violence is a dark chapter in history
that serves as a cautionary tale about the power of propaganda to manipulate
public opinion and promote destructive ideologies. Goebbels' intelligence and
cunning may have served him well in his role as a propagandist, but ultimately
his actions had catastrophic consequences that continue to resonate to this
day.
Comments
Post a Comment